
Trump’s vow of “zero oil and money” for communist Cuba, delivered after toppling Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro, marks a sharp break from the Biden-era softness toward leftist regimes and signals a new America‑first energy and security doctrine.
Story Snapshot
- Trump’s capture of Maduro lets Washington cut off the oil lifeline that kept Cuba’s communist regime afloat.
- The administration plans to run Venezuelan oil in ways that benefit Americans instead of socialist strongmen.
- Cuba faces severe strain as decades of subsidized Venezuelan crude abruptly end.
- Intelligence leaks play down Trump’s claim that Cuba is “ready to fall,” revealing familiar D.C. skepticism.
Trump Uses Maduro’s Fall to Squeeze Havana’s Communist Regime
After U.S. forces captured Nicolás Maduro and flew him to New York on drug‑trafficking charges, President Trump moved immediately to choke off the economic pipeline that had propped up Havana for two decades.
For years, Venezuela shipped subsidized oil to Cuba in exchange for security personnel and other services, effectively outsourcing its internal control to Cuban operatives. By announcing that this flow is now over, Trump is targeting the financial oxygen of a failed communist system long hostile to American interests.
Trump tells Cuba to 'make a deal, before it is too late' https://t.co/zINhOUhhdu
— BBC News (World) (@BBCWorld) January 11, 2026
Trump’s warning that there will be “no more oil or money going to Cuba – zero” directly attacks the bargain that let Cuban intelligence burrow into Venezuela while Havana collected fuel and cash without competing on a real market.
Cuba’s leadership responded by denouncing the U.S. mission as “terrorist” and trying to paint it as pure imperial greed for oil and land. But the basic reality is that a regime living off other people’s resources now has to confront the bill coming due.
Energy Leverage Reclaimed After Years of Weakness
By seizing the initiative in Caracas, the administration gained powerful leverage over one of the world’s largest oil reserves and redirected it away from socialist allies toward U.S. and Venezuelan consumers.
Trump signed an executive order to protect U.S‑held proceeds from Venezuelan oil, tying them to clear foreign‑policy objectives instead of ideological giveaways. He then urged American energy companies to reenter Venezuela, aiming to rebuild production capacity under rules that reward work and investment, not crony socialism.
This shift stands in contrast to left‑leaning policies that constrained domestic supply while tolerating hostile suppliers manipulating markets. With Washington effectively controlling whether Venezuela sends tankers toward Havana or toward paying customers, Cuba’s longtime subsidy arrangement looks fragile.
For American families burned by inflation and high fuel costs in prior years, the idea that Venezuelan oil might help stabilize prices at home rather than subsidize a communist regime abroad underscores how sharply Trump’s approach differs from globalist energy politics.
Cuba’s Strain Exposes the Cost of Central Planning
For ordinary Cubans, the loss of Venezuelan crude means an even tighter squeeze from an already brittle economy built on central planning, rationing, and dependence on foreign patrons.
The island has limited export capacity, chronic shortages, and little access to credit, especially after siding so closely with Maduro’s narco‑dictatorship. Without cheap Venezuelan barrels, Havana faces fuel shortages, transport disruptions, and pressure on food and medical supply chains it has never managed efficiently, even in better times.
Trump’s comment that “Cuba looks like it’s ready to fall” reflects how exposed the regime is when outside subsidies dry up. Leaked intelligence assessments reportedly push back, saying conditions are dire but not necessarily terminal.
That pattern will sound familiar to conservatives who remember decades of experts assuring them that sanctions and pressure campaigns could never work. Whether or not collapse is imminent, the underlying point is clear: when America stops indirectly financing socialism, socialist systems start to buckle.
What This Strategy Signals for Border Security and Regional Politics
The administration is also linking the Venezuela operation to core security concerns that matter deeply to American families: drug trafficking, gangs, and hostile foreign influence in the hemisphere. Officials describe Maduro’s Venezuela as a hub for narcotics and a staging ground for gangs and Iranian and Cuban operatives.
Removing that regime, designating cartels as terrorist organizations, and asserting control over energy flows all fit a broader Trump doctrine that treats the Western Hemisphere as a security perimeter, not a playground for anti‑American experiments.
For conservatives who watched the border crisis explode under Biden and saw socialist experiments applauded in elite circles, the message here is straightforward. Washington is no longer tolerating regimes that export chaos north while cashing in on American passivity.
By forcing Havana to “make a deal, before it is too late,” Trump is using economic leverage, not endless war, to confront a government that has undermined U.S. interests for generations, while signaling that American energy and security will no longer be sacrificed to appease the radical left.
Sources:
‘No more oil or money’: Trump urges Cuba to cut deal with US before it’s too late


















