Supreme Court Deadlocked – Huge Decision Split

U.S. Supreme Court building under clear blue sky.

In a failure to make a much-anticipated ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court’s deadlock halted the creation of the nation’s first religious charter school in Oklahoma, keeping the lower court’s decision intact.

See the tweet below!

This decision leaves many questioning why Justice Barrett recused herself and how this impacts the future of charter schools nationwide.

America’s commitment to religious freedom and education choice hangs in the balance.

On May 22, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court could not reach a consensus on the legality of public state funding for a religious charter school in Oklahoma, resulting in a 4-4 deadlock.

As a result, the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s ruling against the school stands, stalling St. Isidore of Seville Virtual Catholic Charter School’s plans.

The school, steered by the Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa, was to receive $23.3 million in state funding over five years.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s recusal from the case added to the drama, leaving many to wonder why she chose not to participate.

Her absence contributed significantly to the current impasse.

Charter schools like St. Isidore are funded by taxpayers but operate independently, highlighting the ongoing debate over the role of religion in publicly funded education.

Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond expressed satisfaction with the decision, having opposed the school’s establishment.

He cautioned against the potential escalation of funding for other religious schools, emphasizing the necessity to uphold the separation of church and state.

Oklahoma’s Constitution requires charter schools to be nonsectarian, impacting the eventual denial of St. Isidore’s charter status.

Although the U.S. Supreme Court did not set a nationwide precedent, future cases on similar matters may still be considered.

This case tested the boundaries set by the 1st Amendment, which prohibits government-supported religion.

Religious institutions have previously seen victories in state-funded program cases, causing some to argue that denying St. Isidore funding constitutes religious discrimination.

The school expressed disappointment over the ruling. It had planned to provide online religious education to 500 students but is now left in limbo.

This decision highlights the ongoing contentiousness of the charter school landscape.

The case encapsulates crucial American debates over taxpayer funding, religious freedom, and the right of families to choose their children’s schooling—topics dear to those who champion the Constitution and conservative values.